Appellate Rules and Trial Error

New Jersey Appellate Lawyer Representing Clients in Appeals to the New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division, and the United States Court of Appeals for the Third CircuitComplying With The RulesAppellate Rules and Trial Error

Defendants must comply with many other rules and procedures in addition to those governing the timeframe for commencing their appeal. Briefs and accompanying documents must be submitted in the format required by that jurisdiction’s appellate court rules or the clerk will reject the papers. Every court has different formatting requirements for appellate papers. These formatting requirements can be extremely technical, and frequently address issues such as the length of a brief, the manner in which supporting authorities are cited, size of margins and typeface, and even the color of brief covers. There are also numerous rules governing the manner in which papers are filed with the appellate court and served on interested parties. Additionally, some courts allow papers to be filed in hard copy, whereas others require papers to be filed electronically. The same court may require both electronic and hard copy filing and service of all papers.

Such details sound like meaningless hairsplitting to most people, but experienced appellate lawyers understand why full compliance with all such rules is absolutely crucial. As such, it is important to consult, review and understand all of these rules before preparing, filing and serving any papers.

Identifying Error

Formatting requirements govern the physical appearance of appellate court papers. The substance of the arguments raised in papers arises from trial errors. The appellate attorney must be able to identify error in the trial court’s handling of the case. The attorney's brief will then set forth legal arguments discussing each error, and why it contributed to an incorrect or unjust result at trial. Generally speaking, these arguments are composed of the facts surrounding the error, as well as the applicable law. Errors can arise from many sources, including:

  • Failure to admit or exclude physical evidence;
  • Failure to allow or bar testimony from a particular witness;
  • The granting or denial of a pre-trial motion;
  • Incorrect or incomplete jury instructions;
  • Improper or prejudicial remarks by the judge or prosecutor; and
  • Failure to follow proper jury selection procedures.

These and similar trial errors serve as the basis for the arguments included in the appellate brief. An experienced appellate attorney has the skills necessary to review the trial record, isolate errors, research the applicable law, and then draft arguments describing the negative impact that any particular error had on the result at trial.

It is almost impossible to determine whether any particular error can be translated into appellate success without first thoroughly reviewing and analyzing the entire trial record, which includes the pre-trial and trial transcripts, trial exhibits, and any briefs that the parties filed with the trial court. Accordingly, when a defendant first consults with an appellate attorney, it will be very difficult for the attorney to address any potential trial errors with any degree of certainty, because the attorney will probably not have reviewed the record prior to that conversation. Appeals that are not grounded in a thorough analysis of the lower court record will have a diminished chance of success.

James S. Friedman, LLC, represents criminal defendants in the State and Federal appeals court in New Jersey. If you are seeking to appeal a criminal conviction from the New Jersey Superior Court, or from the United States District Court in New Jersey, contact us online or call us toll free at 800-361-6554 to discuss your options.

 
Client Reviews
"I hired Mr. Friedman to represent my son in a criminal matter that could have landed him in jail. Nobody in our family had ever been involved with the criminal justice system before, so this was all very new to us. He was very patient, answered all of our questions, and made sure we understood everything each step of the way. By the time the case was over, my son had a reduced charge for which he only had to pay some fines."
★★★★★
"Mr. Friedman represented me when I was one of several students caught with drugs in a college dorm room. I was set to graduate at the end of the semester, and thought this case would ruin my life. He got my charges dismissed, and the record expunged. This lawyer was a total lifesaver!" Anonymous
★★★★★
"Our daughter has mental health issues. She got into a scuffle with the police and was charged with assaulting an officer. Our attorney, Jim Friedman, was able to show the prosecutor and Judge that the real problem here was her mental stability. She was placed on probation and avoided jail time. Most other lawyers we spoke to refused to take this case, but Jim Friedman took it and got us a great result. Thank you Mr. Friedman!" Anonymous
★★★★★
"I had federal criminal charges and felt totally lost. I was one of who knows how many defendants in this case, and I read on the Internet that almost everyone in federal court end up with a prison sentence, so I was really scared. My first lawyer, who told me that I would probably spend at least some time in prison, barely gave me the time of day after I paid him. Then I hired Jim Friedman to represent me. He stayed with me throughout the entire process. He was always available to answer my questions, and never let me lose hope. He negotiated aggressively with the federal prosecutor and I ended up with a short term of probation. I knew I would get convicted of something, but this lawyer kept me out of jail." Anonymous
★★★★★
"The only part of my trial that was better than watching Mr. Friedman question the witnesses was when the jury came out and said “not guilty” over and over again. You have to see this lawyer in court!" Anonymous
★★★★★
Contact Us
Contact Us