The Federal Sentencing Guidelines

New Jersey Attorney James S. Friedman represents defendants charged with federal crimes in the United States District Courts in New Jersey and New York City. The Federal Sentencing Guidelines

Sentencing in federal criminal cases is controlled, in large part, by the federal sentencing guidelines. Generally speaking, the guidelines take into account two factors, which are: (a) the seriousness of the offense; and (b) the defendant's criminal history. The computation of these two factors lead to the final offense level and, ultimately, the length of the sentence imposed.

I. Offense Level/Seriousness of the Offense

The guidelines have 43 levels of offense seriousness. These levels increase with the seriousness of the offense. Calculating where an offense charged in a particular case will fall out on the range of levels requires consideration of several factors.

  1. Base Offense Level - Every federal offense has a base offense level. This is the starting point for determining the seriousness of a particular offense. As examples, the base offense level for trespass is 4, whereas the base offense level for kidnapping is 32.

  2. Specific Offense Characteristics - These factors will vary from offense to offense, and can increase or decrease the base offense level and, ultimately, the sentence imposed. For example, robbery has a base offense level of 20. Brandishing a firearm during the robbery results in a five-level increase, which raises the offense level to 25. If the firearm was fired during the robbery, there is a seven-level increase, raising the offense level to 27.

  3. Adjustments - Adjustments can apply to any offense, and can also increase or decrease the offense level. Adjustments can include victim-related adjustments, the defendant's role in the offense, obstruction of justice, and acceptance of responsibility. For example, if the defendant was a minimal participant in the offense, the offense level is decreased by four levels. If the defendant knew that the victim was unusually vulnerable (e.g., due to age or physical or mental condition), the offense level is increased by two levels. Obstruction of justice results in a two-level increase. Acceptance of responsibility for the offense can result in a three-level decrease.
II. Criminal History

The guidelines contain six criminal history categories, which are intended to account for the defendant's prior criminal record. Category I is the least serious, where as category VI is the most serious.

III. Final Offense Level

The final offense level is determined by taking the base offense level, and then adding or subtracting any specific offense characteristics or adjustments that apply. The defendant's criminal history category, which is a function of prior criminal record, is then determined.

Every version of the guidelines contains a table or graph. The offense levels appear in a column on the left side, and the criminal history categories appear across the top. The rest of the chart is composed of boxes that contain ranges of months. The point on the chart where the final offense level and criminal history category intersect is the guidelines range, or presumptively reasonable sentence.

IV. Departures or Variances

While a sentence within the guidelines range is considered presumptively reasonable, a sentencing court may "depart" or "vary" above or below the range. This can result in a lower (sometimes, significantly lower) sentence. The extent to which a defendant qualifies for a departure or variance will depend upon the unique facts and circumstances of their case.

This explanation of the guidelines provides only the most general principles underlying federal sentencing. In fact, the computation of a federal sentence can be very complicated, and requires a careful understanding of the facts of the case and the defendant's personal history. Defendants in federal criminal cases need an attorney who understands the guidelines, and how they can be used to obtain every available point reduction.

James S. Friedman LLC has extensive experience representing defendants in federal court. The firm represents defendants with charges involving narcotics, securities fraud, insider trading, government contracts fraud, internet and computer-related crimes, theft of government property, child pornography, tax crimes, and other federal offenses. If you have been charged with a federal crime in New Jersey, or in any federal court in New York City, your first telephone call should be to us. THE CASE AGENTS ARE NOT YOUR FRIENDS. DO NOT SPEAK TO THEM. RATHER, JUST TELL THEM YOU WANT A LAWYER, AND CALL US RIGHT AWAY.

Client Reviews
"I hired Mr. Friedman to represent my son in a criminal matter that could have landed him in jail. Nobody in our family had ever been involved with the criminal justice system before, so this was all very new to us. He was very patient, answered all of our questions, and made sure we understood everything each step of the way. By the time the case was over, my son had a reduced charge for which he only had to pay some fines."
★★★★★
"Mr. Friedman represented me when I was one of several students caught with drugs in a college dorm room. I was set to graduate at the end of the semester, and thought this case would ruin my life. He got my charges dismissed, and the record expunged. This lawyer was a total lifesaver!" Anonymous
★★★★★
"Our daughter has mental health issues. She got into a scuffle with the police and was charged with assaulting an officer. Our attorney, Jim Friedman, was able to show the prosecutor and Judge that the real problem here was her mental stability. She was placed on probation and avoided jail time. Most other lawyers we spoke to refused to take this case, but Jim Friedman took it and got us a great result. Thank you Mr. Friedman!" Anonymous
★★★★★
"I had federal criminal charges and felt totally lost. I was one of who knows how many defendants in this case, and I read on the Internet that almost everyone in federal court end up with a prison sentence, so I was really scared. My first lawyer, who told me that I would probably spend at least some time in prison, barely gave me the time of day after I paid him. Then I hired Jim Friedman to represent me. He stayed with me throughout the entire process. He was always available to answer my questions, and never let me lose hope. He negotiated aggressively with the federal prosecutor and I ended up with a short term of probation. I knew I would get convicted of something, but this lawyer kept me out of jail." Anonymous
★★★★★
"The only part of my trial that was better than watching Mr. Friedman question the witnesses was when the jury came out and said “not guilty” over and over again. You have to see this lawyer in court!" Anonymous
★★★★★
Contact Us
Contact Us